Talk:Trajan's Bridge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Possible reconstruction?[edit]

According to [1] (hungarian), the bridge might be rebuilt in a joint effort by Serbia and Romania. --Mátyás (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC) The article states that: "Serbia, which is proud of his ancient heritage, promotes the reconstruction of the bridge primarily - eight Roman emperors were born on his today's area, more considerable ruined cities are at his disposal -, and tries to dedicate it to the service of his tourist industry. 1 million euros stand onto a provision, which are not enough according to experts, temporarily onto the reconstruction of Traianus bridge, but the plan striking it is claimed: they have safe promises in that direction, that from a Serbian, Romanian and union source the necessary sum accumulates." Sorry for the translation bu i've use an autobot. Still I've find in local media the followings [[2]]:[reply]

A virtual reconstruction[edit]

The project include a holografic laser reconstruction of the bridge. The funds allocated for the all the projects from Serbian Ministry of Economy is 25 millions of euro. (I've belive that the bridge reconstruction is not possible due to the fact that the Iron Gate dam lake is layed out over the bridge) For the bridge reconstruction the estimated budget is 1 million euro and must be provided by local authorities. The Holographic image will be between the two pillars from romanian side and one pillar from serbian side.

the overall project[edit]

  • Infrastructure buildings (parkings, marking etc)
  • 17 roman emperors statues
  • Trajan fortifications reconstruction
  • Holographic Build reconstruction
  • Roman meals for tourists
  • Souvenirs
  • Roman Houses reconstructions

Underwater archaeological investigations[edit]

--Свифт (talk) 13:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Trajan's Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

44.46 m, 17.78 m...[edit]

It's amazing that after 2,000 years, and with erosion and ground subsidence, it's possible to determine the dimensions of the piers within 1 cm precision. Or maybe it's only possible on Wikipedia. 94.191.152.11 (talk) 19:51, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sourced to a Serbian newspaper article. That's established then. 94.191.152.11 (talk) 19:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]