Talk:Total Science
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled[edit]
Whoever, did this article; you should put like a discography, to make it more formal looking. Peace.--Let me see the lightuh...Lightuh! 17:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Made some adjustments to tone... but are they notable?[edit]
I've attempted to get the promotional tone of this article in check by removing the weasel statements and flowery promotional phrasings. There is a long way to go, however, as some of the remaining details cause the article to read like a story rather than an encyclopedia. Sourcing is also an issue. After looking for more sources, it seems that available ones are either self-published by the band or their record labels. This brings up the question of their notability. Any other opinions out there on this? Any way this article can be sourced to the point that it meets WP:NM? Skeletor3000 (talk) 22:32, 11 November 2019 (UTC)