Talk:Torres (musician)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Torres (musician) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 October 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 30 June 2013 by reviewer MatthewVanitas (talk · contribs).

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

RfC: Is this article's NPOV really under dispute? / Should the POV tag be removed?[edit]

Closing per a WP:ANRFC request.
There is a clear consensus, that there is no POV-dispute, and therefore the tag is inappropriate. (BTW the tag was already replaced with {{POV-check}} in this edit, and it wasn't objected since than.) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A POV tag was placed on this article and listed as June 2013. However, no NPOV dispute was ever filed on the NPOVN and there is nothing on this talk page. I'm placing the POV-check tag instead and creating a request for comment so that this can get resolved. Nobody ever input what they felt was disputed. Sephiroth87 (talk) 22:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The article mentions TORRES too often. I've removed unnecessary capitalizations in my last edit. There should be pronouns used instead. And unsourced claims must be removed or verified citing reliable sources. It requires edit on large scale to tone down promotion content and deleting unverified claims. I'm doing the same. Feel free to reinstate the contents being removed by me but you must submit to Wikipedia verifiabiliy standard (WP:PROVEIT). Regards, Anupmehra -Let's talk! 02:18, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

alternative account Sorry, I could not make required changes. I've got to go. Hope, someone else would do it in the meanwhile. Indian Wikipedian ^✈ 03:14, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When was the album Torres actually released? It is said January 23 in the article and supported using a referenced published on January 22. How is it possible? The ref displays in the top, Torres, Torres [Review], POSTED BY STEVE HARUCH ON TUE, JAN 22, 2013 AT 9:31 AM, and Torres, Torres, (Self-released), Jan. 22, 2013. I'm confused. Is it January 22, 2013 album was released on? And on the same day at 09:31AM, a review was published? Anupmehra -Let's talk! 22:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've been made changes, I felt should be made in order to remove POV tag except deleting few unverified claims. If anyone have questions over my edit, please raise it here on the article's talk page instead edit warring. Regards, Anupmehra -Let's talk! 22:50, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It seems to me this entire article should be nominated for deletion. If it gets nominated, someone please let me know. BlueSalix (talk) 03:38, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uninvolved editor responding to RfC request: (1) I do not see any basis for the NPOV tag, so agree with the OP that it should be removed; (2) seems like just barely enough third-party sourcing to justify the existence of the piece, so would like to see some expansion; (3) article needs heavy-duty copy editing to conform to Wiki style and to improve writing. For example, Torres was raised in Macon city located in the central Georgia, United States. is substandard. Tvoz/talk 01:51, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'd agree. Since it has no clear NPOV dispute there's no point in the tag. The Pov check tag might at least find an issue to be fixed. Alternatively if it meets the criteria for deletion that will also take care of it.Serialjoepsycho (talk) 04:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.