Talk:Tony Buzbee

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tony Buzbee article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

Biography: Military / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Houston (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HoustonWikipedia:WikiProject HoustonTemplate:WikiProject HoustonHouston articles

This reads like a CV[edit]

Far too promotional... this needs to be neutral instead of reading like an advertisement or a curriculum vitae. K7L (talk) 00:31, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article typifies the main problem with Wikipedia[edit]

This article is obviously created by the subject or someone working for him to promote his business. There was a time when Wikipedia used to jump on garbage like this and delete it, but it doesn't seem to do that anymore and that's the chief reason Wikpedia isn't taken seriously. For the record, if Mr. Buzbee thinks he's fooling anyone, he's wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goateeki (talk • contribs) 15:23, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, this really is an offensive use of Wikipedia. The chief source of information in this article is the lawyer's own website, articles from PR Newswire (!) that cite to press releases by the lawyer and an online article or two authored by someone other than the lawyer, but in publications that no one would argue are of real consequence. If this guy gets a Wikipedia page, than every moderately successful lawyer in America (there are many) who's willing to devote an inordinate time to marketing and self promotion should have a Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goateeki (talk • contribs) 15:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking citations[edit]

I just added a refimprove tag to the article. It has an alarming habit of making series of claims with some cited and some not, or putting citations at the end of a paragraph as if they justify all the content in the paragraph when in reality they are only a source for the final claim. For example, from the lead:

Buzbee has obtained more than $1 billion in judgments and verdicts
Buzbee has represented multiple governmental entities, including the State of Louisiana, and the Basque Government in the Kingdom of Spain.
From philanthropy: Buzbee donated $1 Million to the Friendswood Methodist Church.
From politics, twice: Buzbee has supported Democratic and Republican politicians at the local, state and federal levels.... That same year, Buzbee served as debate coach to Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst in his unsuccessful run for the United States Senate.

I may have missed something in the cited sources that I checked, but even in that case the citations should follow these statements as well as whatever else they're used as a source for. Mehmuffin (talk) 15:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DWI worth mentioning...ONCE[edit]

The fact that he was arrested for one DWI and it was dismissed is pertinent information. However, mentioning it repeatedly as it is in this article is completely inappropriate, biased and unfair. I recommend someone knowledgeable about the subject matter edit the article so that it imparts knowledge and information, not bias. Fabiemay (talk) 00:36, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Everytime it gets added in the reputation section, the same person removes it. Whoever is removing it is more than likely associated with Buzbee and wants people to forget about his DWI and how he was able to accomplish a 1 year program in approximately 8 months. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Persnackitylad (talk • contribs) 20:27, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the DWI and dismissal should be mentioned in the article. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:06, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It can be mentioned, but ONCE. Most appropriately in his personal life section. Right way now with the big subsection saying "DWI" I think is undue weight. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 20:41, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to add the template in the heading earlier, but there's a discussion about the DWI stuff over at WP:BLPN#Tony Buzbee. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 20:27, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with inclusion, but looking outside the BLP aspect, it doesn't need its own third-level heading per MOS:PARA. Same for the Real estate third-level heading. Larry Hockett (Talk) 20:54, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Large Number of Unsourced Claims[edit]

There are many unsourced claims on this page (the entire charity section, for example, which I’m not even sure is notable). I think it makes sense to remove these unsourced sections, and tone done much of the promotional language on the page in general, but before I do so I wanted to bring it here. These revisions are necessary, I think, on a page that has had promotional issues throughout its history. —Hobomok (talk) 17:01, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore this—just realized much of the unsourced, promotional content was added today by new user (rubiojesse) with only two edits.

Username fits with employee of page’s subject, which fits with the history of adding promotional content on this page by single-purpose accounts. -Hobomok (talk) 17:07, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]