Talk:Tomi Lahren/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2

"pro-life"

This phrase should not be used unless it is in quotes, is preceded by "so-called," or by "self-identified."

Considering that many so identified are pro-war, pro-death penalty, and climate change deniers, an accurate description is not pro-life, but anti-abortion. Michtom (talk) 22:24, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

I'm afraid that's a violation of NPOV. Either we call either position by their self-chosen names (pro-life/pro-choice) or by some third-party, arguably more correct description (anti-abortion/pro-abortion). However, it is not okay to add disclaimers to one epithet but not to others (as you did on Cenk Uygur. All the criticism you level at the term "pro-life" could just as easily be construted towards the term "pro-choice" (what's the choice about? who gets to make the choice?) Also, inserting a "what is called" (as you did on the Cenk article) is also linguistically inept as any noun in the article could have that addition. We use words for things because that's what they "are called". Str1977 (talk) 06:45, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanksgiving highlight

One editor removed content on Lahren speaking fondly of migrant getting teargassed at the border. This was reported on by two RS and just quotes her own words on the subject. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

What does it add to the article? KidAd (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Usmc family, military brat link. Should be no assiciation, to this closed minded individual.

Why is there a link to a military brat page when the the USMC family is a highlighted icon.She has no traits or experience in this area. My father was a retired air force colonel. Vietam veteran, purple heart recipant. She has not experience any of the traits to be called "military", although the brat part is point on. I have no hometown, no since of self. I love people of different nationalities, I'm open minded to immigrants and cultural differences. This (BLP violation removed) Tomi Lahren isnt close to being a military brat, her dad works at Target. She never moved to a different country or state. She lived in South Dakota her whole sheltered life. A only child, a (BLP violation removed). Please remove the link to military brats. From someone who went to 6 different elementary schools in 4 states and 1 other country, she does not meet the criteria to be called open minded, (BLP violation removed). TimEd13 (talk) 15:22, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 January 2019

Metoo 172.79.131.5 (talk) 22:38, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 22:41, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Stupid line in the article

"denied climate change"

No one denies climate change, people argue about the impact of humans and deny MANMADE climate change. But that`s something entirely different.

80.131.52.101 (talk) 23:39, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Revealed: Fox News personality Tomi Lahren’s line of "patriot" yoga pants are made in China

https://www.salon.com/2019/08/26/revealed-fox-news-personality-tomi-lahrens-line-of-patriot-yoga-pants-are-made-in-china/. KurtR (talk) 19:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Salon is not generally considered reliable (see WP:RSP), and the article content is from Raw Story, which is even less reliable. Even with better sourcing, I don't see how the article is relevant to Lahren's biography, especially as it does not mention of her "patriot yoga pants" or any clothing line or related material. – Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 20:46, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
KurtR, putting a link here with no context is not helpful. I'm considering whether or not this thread violates WP:NOTFORUM. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
There are other sources like DailyMail, check Google News. It's time to mention her clothing line and this thing. She also wrote on Twitter about it. KurtR (talk) 20:55, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
KurtR, please see WP:DAILYMAIL for why we don't use that as a source. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:58, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the links. Found articles on Dailydot and on Washington Examiner, they are probably better. It's a question of time, that more reliable news will publish this story, let's wait. KurtR (talk) 21:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)