Talk:Tom Kiely

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Approach by Great Britain & Ireland Olympic team[edit]

This article states twice that Kiely was approached by GBI to represent them at the game and that his fare was offered. This is absolute nonsense and should be removed from the article. The proof of this is the fact that GBI did not send ANY athletes to any games until 1912. Prior to this the team was always made up of gentlemen who paid their own way. The key fact that proves this as nonsense is the fact that in excess of forty gentleman sportsmen had planned to travel to St Louis to represent GBI. However GBI refused to sanction any of them as representatives of GBI because of they did not wish to be involved in what they regarded as a haphazard games. Some still travelled and took part but officially there was no GBI team at the games. Kiely's relationship to team GBI only came after the games when the recorders of the games wished to state his Nationality. GBI at this stage stated that he could not be recorded as having competed for Ireland because no such Olympic team existed. As a result he was retrospectively recorded as competing for GBI instead.

Copyvio[edit]

Most of the text seems to be a copyvio from http://homepage.eircom.net/~ancaislean/carrick_people.html , and so I believe it should be deleted. Jan.Kamenicek 12:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Track AND field?[edit]

Shouldn't the phrase "...the first Olympic multi-event track champion for 16 centuries." read "...the first Olympic multi-event track and field champion for 16 centuries." Keomike (talk) 04:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tom Kiely. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:40, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]