Talk:To the Stars (album)/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Curious as to why {{LRH}} was removed from the bottom of this article? Cirt (talk) 17:45, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- I removed it because it seemed superfluous; this article, To the Stars, is not part of that navbox. I don't have any great issue with it being there, however, but it didn't seem to serve much of a purpose to me. --Kakofonous (talk) 18:26, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- While I didn't add this article to that navbox as not itself directly being a work by L. Ron Hubbard, I think it is likely to assume the reader might be interested in those closely correlated links. I agree the other nav footer was a bit too general though. Cirt (talk) 18:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed on both counts; I guess I'm not really a navbox fan :). --Kakofonous (talk) 18:40, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hehe, I sorta am. Thanks for being so cordial! Cirt (talk) 18:41, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. --Kakofonous (talk) 18:47, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hehe, I sorta am. Thanks for being so cordial! Cirt (talk) 18:41, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed on both counts; I guess I'm not really a navbox fan :). --Kakofonous (talk) 18:40, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- While I didn't add this article to that navbox as not itself directly being a work by L. Ron Hubbard, I think it is likely to assume the reader might be interested in those closely correlated links. I agree the other nav footer was a bit too general though. Cirt (talk) 18:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
GA review
- See full review at: /GA1.
This GAN has passed, and this is now a good article! If you found this review helpful, please consider helping out a fellow editor by reviewing another good article nomination. Help and advice on how to do so is available at Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles, and you can ask for the help of a GAN mentor, if you wish.