Talk:Thunder Road Films

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Film: Filmmaking / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

California: Los Angeles / Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Cinema / Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 2 May 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Thunder Road Pictures. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Untitled[edit]

Create Random House Films, create Likely Story and create Bauer Martinez Studios. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.170.36.79 (talk) 05:45, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Logo[edit]

Please add the logo. Parker Barry Kipland (talk) 22:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John wick[edit]

Do a movie of John Wick from his start when his wife was alive when he got out of it. The beginning. 2604:BFC0:101:FB1D:11C5:3C48:E1F6:34E3 (talk) 21:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 May 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Material Works 23:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thunder Road Films → Thunder Road Pictures – This move from a blocked user was not discussed and was unexplained as well. The company produces more than just films (i.e. television shows), and the WP:COMMONNAME would either be simply "Thunder Road" or "Thunder Road Pictures". Some support for the common name claim: The company is listed as "Pictures" in Variety's profile on the executive, an old Variety article, an IndieWire article, Deadline often just uses "Thunder Road", but they also use "Pictures", and The Hollywood Reporter etc. I know we use what RS use, but FWIW, they seem to refer to themselves as Thunder Road Pictures as well. I would simply revert the move, but a formal RM will allow speedy renames of its categories. -2pou (talk) 22:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. – Material Works 23:23, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mild support, or move to Thunder Road (company) - This company's branding is inconsistent - I see "Films" and "Pictures" alternatively and in pretty equal frequency (their own official Facebook page uses both). I think, though, the common name is just "Thunder Road", so we can avoid the confusion with a parenthetical disambiguation. -- Netoholic @ 04:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Although not as WP:NATURAL of a disambiguation, I would not oppose that alternative if consensus pushes towards that direction. -2pou (talk) 16:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thunder Road (company) is not a valid option, per WP:NATURAL. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:40, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Its absolutely an option when the NATURAL alternatives are not consistent or common. -- Netoholic @ 10:20, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The COMMONNAME of the studio is irrelevant in this case, as we are trying to determine what the correct suffix of the company is. To do this, we should look to official sources rather than third-party references (the COMMONNAME would probably be just "Thunder Road", but that's a DAB page). John Wick: Chapter 4 is Thunder Road's most recent film (according to this article), and per this press release the company is credited as "Thunder Road Films" and not "Thunder Road Pictures". Thunder Road's next film is listed as Love Again, and on the poster's billing block the company is once again credited as "Thunder Road Films" and not "Thunder Road Pictures". Furthermore, the company's Twitter page uses "Thunder Road Films" in its name and bio, though its handle remains @thunderroadpics. All this is plentiful evidence that the company's current name is "Thunder Road Films". InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:40, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: Relisting to get a clearer consensus. – Material Works 23:23, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.