Talk:Threads (social network)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Native Windows app[edit]

Threads doesn't offer a native Windows app, so it should be removed from the list of native clients in the infobox. HxD (talk) 05:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://digiday.com/media/news-publishers-hesitate-to-commit-to-investing-more-into-threads-next-year-despite-growing-engagement/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Redraiderengineer (talk) 11:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need to update section "Possibility of open interoperability"[edit]

Now that threads has started to enable federation, we may need to update this section, or add a new one. Does anyone have any reputable sources that talk about the federation stuff? Semitones (talk) 02:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Section on fedipact is excessive[edit]

Does this really need to be an entire paragraph? I feel like it'd be better suited as a sentence or two next to the mention of federation. It also comes off as slightly advertising-y given this post: https://cyberpunk.lol/@vantablack/112135698174361861 KeK, signing off (talk) 02:47, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty of mentions in secondary sources so IMO a paragraph is fine. Just need to make sure it matches what secondary sources are saying, which I just did. Personally I don't like the hype either but what can ya do, the media has talked about it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ pandakekok9 (talk) Resist internet censorship in the Philippines! 12:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]