Talk:Think of the children/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vesuvius Dogg (talk · contribs) 07:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please be patient, Cirt ... I'll start my review in the next week or so. Article seems very sound. Vesuvius Dogg (talk) 07:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cirt has been inactive since 5 November. Notify me when you finish this review, I may be able to help. sst✈^(discuss) 08:02, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vesuvius Dogg:, thanks very much for taking on this review, I really appreciate it. — Cirt (talk) 14:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Cirt:, with my inactivity, I think this got pulled from review. I may revisit it, but no promises — am withdrawing myself a bit from Wikipedia — but with your happy return I may revisit this. Glad you're back! Vesuvius Dogg (talk) 14:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Vesuvius Dogg:Thank you very much for your reply, I await your decision with pleasure and appreciation. :) — Cirt (talk) 15:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With regret, Cirt, Vesuvius Dogg, this review was closed over six weeks ago, and cannot be reopened. Vesuvius Dogg is more than welcome to open a new review (under GA2) at any time—naturally, if this is done, it would effectively be a promise to conduct the review in a timely fashion—but not here on this page. Best of luck to you both, whatever is decided. BlueMoonset (talk) 08:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Vesuvius Dogg:, this won't really change anything when you are ready to do the review, please let me know and we can do that at that time, hopefully soon? — Cirt (talk) 16:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, Cirt. FWIW, I think the article's in great shape. Vesuvius Dogg (talk) 16:19, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much, Vesuvius Dogg, for your helpful assistance in this quality review process! It's much appreciated after waiting about five (5) months for a review. And also thank you very very much for your kind words about my quality improvement efforts to the article, I really appreciate that a lot! :) — Cirt (talk) 16:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]