Talk:The Virgin's Lover

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Royalty. For more information, visit the project page.English RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject English RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject English RoyaltyEnglish royalty articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

AAAAAAAAAAH! THIS ARTICLE NEEDS HELP![edit]

First, we need a better summary. It's okay to give away the ending; just say "spoilers ahead". I would write the summary myself, but I've yet to read the book thoroughly enough. Also, a section on historical accuracy would be great as I know the book isn't going to be 100% right. Elesi (talk) 21:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Sub Heading[edit]

I just added a subheading (feel free to edit it) based on the controversial versus historical facts stated in the book - sorry its not that good!!Sweetlife31 (talk) 07:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]