Talk:The Trip (2021 film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Trip (2021 film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Reception section cleanup[edit]

The section is slightly meandering and bloated. I've fixed a few minor details, but someone more capable than I am should take note that it is very bloated and reads more like a list than it probably should for a concise section. It's a good start as far as the number of sources, but the quotes used and the formatting needs revised. 2603:6010:11F0:3C0:34D9:F322:9C29:28C6 (talk) 20:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I question the inclusion of Spanish film critics for this Norwegian film. It is a particularly odd choice since the editor who added it freely admitted to not understanding Spanish. It would be good to include Norwegian reviews if possible though. And to the above point, the grammar and prose of section could easily be improved by any good copyeditor. A wholesale rewrite might be needed later, but what is there now could be improved substantially without needing to go that far. -- 109.79.167.221 (talk) 13:45, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed several non-notable critics. Just because someone passed the low bar set by Rotten Tomatoes does not mean we should reference them in this encyclopedia. -- 109.78.196.150 (talk) 12:31, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]