Talk:The Terminal Man

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tagged for comments like:

  "He attempts to tell the reader "
  "an unimpressively characterized man "

which really give me the impression that the author didn't like the book. 202.81.18.30 (talk) 02:37, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

I think that the article writer was just unskilled, I fixed the offending phrase and made a few other changes. 24.18.249.218 (talk) 22:49, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews?[edit]

Are user reviews from Amazon.com really suitable for Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4RM0 (talk • contribs) 09:17, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was the one who wrote the 'reviews' section. It seemed to me that a citation of an Amazon rating would have been analogous to the 'Rottentomatoes.com' rating that are often quoted for films. I appreciate that Amazon itself is a seller and not a reviewing forum, but I don't know of anything equivalent to Rottentomatoes for books. Any ideas? 86.156.0.244 (talk) 17:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance of Gender Roles comment[edit]

The comment at the end about the book and movie having a female doctor doesn't seem to be relevant, unless it's notable for being an early or good portrayal of a woman in a traditionally male role. I added the reference to the movie as the previous comment was unclear. I'm just not sure if the comment is even useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.165.152.167 (talk) 14:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care for this comment about a particular character being female in both the book and movie either, it just seems sexist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pegminer (talk • contribs) 18:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FIrst account of a virus?[edit]

Our article on Self replicating machines claimed that this book contains the first ever description of a computer virus - predating the Internet. However When HARLIE Was One was published in the same year and also describes a computer virus. Which of these was published first? Is it merely coincidence that both authors came up with the identical (and rather novel) concept? SteveBaker (talk) 16:13, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(Answering my own question): I got in touch with the author of When HARLIE Was One and he confirms that the part of the story containing the concept of a computer virus was first published as a short story in Galaxy magazine in 1969. So Crighton was not the first to think of that. SteveBaker (talk) 03:38, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About the wig[edit]

Our plot summary mentions first a "blonde wig" and then, out of nowhere, "the black wig". Is that right? Equinox ◑ 21:20, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also wondering about the wig.

In the 1974 film, Benson is given a BLOND wig and BEFORE he is operated on. 2A00:23C7:2B13:9001:4DD9:395A:783C:26AC (talk) 21:32, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]