Talk:The Showcase (album)

The Showcase (album) was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 20, 2018). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan: Music Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:56, May 31, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Music task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Showcase (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: DannyMusicEditor (talk · contribs) 07:09, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've waited long enough. Regretfully, it does not look good to me at a first glance and I think it will likely have to be failed, but I'll have my final verdict tomorrow (it's 2AM here and I'm going to bed). dannymusiceditor ^oops 07:09, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

To start with:[edit]

There is not nearly enough coverage in this article. You fail to provide any type of critical reception, and you should never have a miscallaneous collection of "information" grouped together as one section; please see MOS:LAYOUT for more on this.

Lead:[edit]

The word you are looking for is "preceding", not "preluding".
A stylization in all caps should only be added when several mainstream publications are referring to it as such. Otherwise, it's just like another ordinary wordmark. Remove it. In any case, it would need to be bolded as well.

"Information":[edit]

Again with "preceding", not "preluding". I see this is almost copy-pasted from the lead, please do better than that.
"Working with the album's concept of a showcase, the group decided on the track listing's order based on how they would perform them live."....you basically say this again, also unsourced later on, in "background and composition". Move this version of the information chunk to the background section.
The very same thing happens with the next paragraph.
After moving those two chunks, what's left looks like a decent section on the album's release, so just retitle it "release" and move it down past the Background/composition.

Hiroki[edit]

You focus way too much on the departure of Hiroki, and it's not part of the album, this is more relevant on the bad's page. Maybe you should keep some of it, but thqat's the purpose of "background", really. "background" isn't just for the album itself, it's for what was happening in the band and what affected them up to the release of the album. Not to mention that the quotes also need directly cited, even if the citations in the article somewhere do have these quotes.

Others[edit]

Charts: Need citations.

Music videos should not have a dedicated section, they can be covered in "release".

That is all I have to say. It falls quite short of the mark. Please fix these and expand on information surrounding the album in general, and you can contact me for a re-review. dannymusiceditor ^oops 04:26, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]