Talk:The Rose of Versailles/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Link20XX (talk · contribs) 22:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this. Link20XX (talk) 22:02, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@Morgan695: I have completed my initial review. Just needs a few things before it can be promoted:

Checklist

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comments

Sourcing:

• Comic Natalie is published by Natasha, Inc, so that should be added to those references as the publisher.
  • Done.
• Link to the article for Anime News Network in the references from them where it is not linked.
  • Done.
• References 45 and 47 need an author.
  • Done.
• Reference 59 needs to link to the article on Natalie (website) and needs an access date.
  • Done.

Images:

• The image of François Augustin Regnier de Jarjayes is tagged with a message stating "You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States."
  • That image seemed to be dubiously sourced, so I swapped it for a new one.

Other:

• This article lacks even some critical reviews. You should get at least 2 or 3 in Reception.
  • Done.

Small question

• How much of this was translated from French? I'm just curious; this won't effect the GA review and you can completely ignore this if you want.
  • Almost entirely. The bulk of the previous article was sourced primarily from fan sites; probably a consequence of the original article being written in the mid-2000s when there were few/no mainstream English-language sources on the series.

Anyway, that is all. Resolve them and I will happily pass the article. Link20XX (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

• • @Link20XX: Response above. Morgan695 (talk) 18:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
    • @Morgan695: Alright. Your changes addressed my few concerns so I am closing this review as Pass. Congratulations and thanks for answering my question! Link20XX (talk) 19:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)