Talk:The Review of Economic Studies

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"The Review of Economic Studies" or just "Review of Economic Studies".[edit]

While this is debatable, I, as an economist, am pretty sure that it is the latter.

1) https://www.restud.com/ : while the head welcome does include "The", but if you look at the bottom, whether it be Archive and Advance Access, the YouTube video name, or contact detail, they all spell "Review..." without "The".

2) https://www.restud.com/editors-report/ : they never put "The" in their name.

3) https://www.restud.com/restudtour/ : again, they never put "The" in their name.

4) https://www.restud.com/submissions/ : again, they never put "The" in their name.

5) https://academic.oup.com/restud/subscribe : see the company name at the bottom. It spelled "Review of Economic Studies Ltd." without "The". DDQuanta (talk) 17:56, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The websites are clear

All use The Review of Economic Studies, and most importantly, so does the cover. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:53, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]