Talk:The One and Only (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:1711.jpg[edit]

Image:1711.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:17, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rights to the song?[edit]

Is there any truth to the rumour that he sold the rights to the song and can no longer play it live? Thedarxide (talk) 09:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Song writer[edit]

The article states 'When writing the song Chesney Hawkes imagined he was Welsh Student Ian Moore and wanted to record the greatness he felt at that moment' but the song was written by Nik Kershaw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.102.178.199 (talk) 07:12, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed this line, as it is not referenced with a source EHonkoop (talk) 14:01, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 June 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved.(non-admin closure) Eventhorizon51 (talk) 13:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

– Since September, the song has received more pageviews than all the other articles combined (34,675 for the song, 32,044 for all the others). The song is over 20 years old and is still more popular than subjects that are way more recent.[1][2] Unreal7 (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose per primary topic, the nominator has failed to make a case for long-term significance and it is such a popular title that any page views could change month by month. --Richhoncho (talk) 08:58, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Yet another example of the problem with page views. Andrewa (talk) 10:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The One and Only (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The One and Only (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:59, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_One_and_Only_(song)&oldid=1207177509"