Talk:The Next Day/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Speatle (talk · contribs) 12:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
I’ll review this soon, probably within the next week or so. I’ve started reviewing the article, and hope to finish tomorrow.
- Speatle Done – zmbro (talk) (cont) 17:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Looks mostly good. I did a bit more ce for things I forgot to mention. One more thing before I can pass the article. " "(You Will) Set the World on Fire" is a pompous mid-1980s rocker, echoing Bowie's cover of Pop's "Bang Bang" on Never Let Me Down. It takes place in 1960s Greenwich Village amid protests occurring during that time." Is there a source for this, or is it another one that has a cite one or two sentences later? Speatle (talk to me) please ping me when replying to something I said. 18:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Once again, mostly good, although there are some sentences that might need a citation moved over (ex. “Where Are We Now?" is about Bowie's time living in Berlin in the late 1970s). Earwig shows a copyvio percentage of 43.8, but it’s all quotes and song names.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Despite being over 100,000 bytes, the article is a quick read while still being relatively focused and covering major aspects.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- All looking good here!
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- I’m not very experienced with image copyright, but to my unexperienced eye, it looks good to me.
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall: This is a nice article, but it still needs a bit of minor work before I can wholeheartedly pass it.
I’m putting it on hold for a week so minor issues noted in the review can be fixed.All issues have been fixed and concerns assuaged. This article passes.- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: