Talk:The Musk Who Fell to Earth

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

The Simpsons Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Simpsons, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to The Simpsons on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.The SimpsonsWikipedia:WikiProject The SimpsonsTemplate:WikiProject The SimpsonsThe Simpsons articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

edit

Collaboration: Featured topic Drive
Copyedit:
Merge:
Cleanup: Ralph Wiggum, Milhouse Van Houten
Shorten plot synopsis:
Free-use images: Jon Vitti, Pamela Hayden, Greg Daniels, Ian Maxtone-Graham, Jim Reardon, Alf Clausen
Reference: Bongo Comics Group, The Heartbroke Kid, World of Springfield
Expand: The Simpsons Theme, Bongo Comics, Mark Kirkland, Jim Reardon, The Simpsons: Tapped Out
Stubs: Neil Affleck, Bob Anderson (director), Wes Archer, J. Stewart Burns More...

Bias[edit]

This page contains some bias. 68.50.116.194 (talk) 19:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious Ayn Rand References[edit]

The supposed references to Atlas Shrugged mentioned in the lede are highly dubious, unverifiable, and seem to be pure speculation on the part of the contributor. 184.147.35.43 (talk) 16:53, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary lacks neutrality[edit]

There are multiple examples of uncited, unsourced opinion included in the plot summary. Examples include, "This is an unusual plot twist because it hasn't been stated the bird carries any injury or is in need of rehabilitation", "For no explained reason" and "making the entire opening sequence a long, tawdry and largely senseless segue into introducing Musk".

The plot summary is not a review and nor should it contain the author's opinion with regard to the episode. If these statements are quotes of other reviews, they should be included in a section dedicated to the reception of the episode. Radiatia (talk) 06:03, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]