Talk:The Lurkers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Help improve[edit]

Until I began working on 'The Lurkers' article it was a stub that had only be edited once in six months. Any further attempts at improvement would be most helpful. Good luck. Yozzer66 (talk) 22:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Duplicate bands[edit]

I'm sure this happens a lot... Came here looking for the current NSW Australia band called the Lurkers (lurkers.com.au) who wrote "Mining Man", better known as "Lock the Gate" 121.44.12.251 (talk) 23:12, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on The Lurkers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Desperate tone[edit]

This reads like a desperate attempt to make the Lurkers seem more important than they were. So many minor achievements scraped together into an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.0.168.54 (talk) 08:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They pass WP:BAND so they're entitled to an article. As are loads of other even smaller bands who pass the threshold.
Actually they pass WP:BAND on several counts (mutiple nontrivial reliable sources, been in a national chart namely UK Albums Chart, two albums on a big-name indie label namely Beggars Banquest, featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or television network namely several Peel Sessions) Romomusicfan (talk) 22:54, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]