Talk:The Laura Ingraham Show

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment[edit]

This page contained a lot of "opinion" words; I have substituted non-judgmental words in their place in many cases (e.g., using "vocal" instead of "stanch"). Further, it was very familiar, calling Ingraham "Laura" in many places. I would recommend that interested parties go through the other sections that I didn't modify and make similar changes for the sake of consistency.

I also removed the "Iraq Visit" section because it was redundant. If an editor feels that is a critical section, I recommend not duplicating the full text of that section in the "Major issues covered" section, but rather putting in a cross-reference and/or link.Dougom (talk) 01:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also removed the "Iraq Visit" description, after somebody restored it. The several episodes described are two years old, and don't demonstrate anything necessary to understand the nature of the Laura Ingraham show.

I also did a few other minor edits. Perhaps a Laura Ingraham fan will restore the page back to its original form, which I think makes a nice little promotional advertisement for "Laura." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.112.190.23 (talk) 17:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone have her educational background (college/university, degree)? What was her SAT score? Verificity (talk) 18:42, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

.Big question Laura Ingraham are you racist? you do sound very racist just like Trump every time you talk about immigration and other kind of race rather than Anglos. That is very disappointed disrespectful on your behalf regardless of your degrees and if you ran for president I wouldn’t vote for you. Just for the record this country has been made up of immigrants from all over the world. It appears clearly that you are a Republican and long time ago a professor made me understood that Republican means Whites for Whites and no other color or race should be in the U.S and you doing exactly as that phrase means. You criticize every Democrat why don’t you criticize any Republican are republicans paying you because you sound so fake and like I mentioned before you sound exactly like Trump Armandoespa (talk) 06:47, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is your show real or you are put in this show by republicans and get paid by Republicans big bucks. And just curious why are only democrats naive and all the sudden Republicans are correct and right in every law they want to impose. I highly believe you are a racist Republican who believes that America is only For Whites but right now there is no such thing as pure whites simply because everyone is mixed doesn’t that scares you. Armandoespa (talk) 06:53, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I simply believe that the census should not even ask if anyone is a citizen and I do recall that was not the purpose of a census since the beginning. Therefore, I as a citizen I don’t fill it out and now I will certainty not filling out again. Also what makes you think that everyone who fills it out and sends it back had answered with the correct information, I wouldn’t because as a citizen I wouldn’t trust it simply because the government itself can’t be trusted. Armandoespa (talk) 06:59, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the citizenship questions sounds so fake why should I answered that question and for the record it was never so easy to answer that question because it was never asked that much it is till now that Trump was elected that has been trying to change modify even the constitution how naive can you be to change or modify the constitution or other rights or laws and you really talk so bad about the Democrats wow that is really crazy not only that but scary just to think that you were the 1st lady because I bet you and Trump would make the United States a look alike communist country. Out of the blue question wasn't The Trump Family members of the KKK? Therefore, how would I vote for someone who had belong to the KKK and has no politics education nor background. Armandoespa (talk) 07:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit[edit]

Preserving here by providing this link. My rationale was: "Excessive intricate detail / uncited trivia". Please let me know if there are any concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:14, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't looked at it, but if it was, indeed, uncited and equated trivia, it probably shouldn't be in the article. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 01:52, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]