This article was nominated for deletion on 4 September 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
I'm sorry, but I have been waiting patiently for someone to talk about the lack of neutrality in this article. I have waited over two weeks, even though the person who put this tag on is a newbie with only fifteen other edits. If someone wants to debate the neutrality, or provide a suggestion to where it could be more neutral, please do so on the talk page. Guyanakoolaid 09:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I didn't put up a neutrality tag, but I'll bite. This article needs a good deal of work in order to approach NPOV. Right now it reads like a press release aimed at getting record shop owners to buy Joggers albums, not an encyclopedia entry. Phrases like "songs marked by virtousic playing which still retain a catchy pop sensibility," the quirkiness and playfulness of the Joggers," and "another complex-yet-fun album" just don't match up with an encyclopedic tone.
I do think there's a lot of good information in the article (the bit about scale-jogging was interesting, though it's unsourced), I just think the prose should be rejiggered to be a little less laudatory. thither 07:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
