Talk:The Everly Brothers discography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Star Spangled Springer.[edit]

This 1973 Phil Everly Album (UK RCA SF8370) does not appear in the discography.
I was going to delete Star Spangled Springer from another article thinking it was vandalism, but Googled it first.
There appear to be no solo albums in the discography, only solo singles.
I don't know much about the Everly's - but assume there are more solo albums? Could an Everly fan add the solo albums?
Ta - Arjayay (talk) 09:14, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know Phil Everly had a self titled album in 1983 that spawned the top 10 UK single "She Means Nothing to Me" with Cliff Richard. A quick look up shows Don Everly had a self titled album in 1970 and his second solo album in 1974 titled Sunset Towers.[1] AusChartMan (talk) 13:06, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Very Best of The Everly Brothers compilation album[edit]

The compilation album called "The Very Best of The Everly Brothers" from the early 1970s doesn't seem to be on this list, if anyone has the release date of this album, it can be added to the list. The track listing for the album is: 1. Bye Bye Love 2. ('Til) I Kissed You 3. Wake Up Little Susie 4. Crying In The Rain 5. Walk Right Back 6. Cathy's Clown 7. Bird Dog 8. All I Have To Do Is Dream 9. Devoted To You 10. Lucille 11. So Sad (To Watch Good Love Go Bad) 12. Ebony Eyes

Apparently, it's all Warner Bros. re-recordings of their original recordings. This is it on CD, http://www.amazon.com/Very-Best-Everly-Brothers/dp/B000002KA5 but I know it exists on vinyl as I've listened to it on vinyl. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.91.180.45 (talk) 00:42, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


References[edit]

Rhythm and Blues[edit]

In Pete Townshend's memoir, Who I Am, he refers to an Everly Brothers album called Rhythm and Blues but I don't see it here. Does such an album exist? Stephen Rasku (talk) 20:44, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Singles discography[edit]

Artificially breaking up the singles discography so that the B-sides are located in a different section (and way out of chronological order) seems arbitrary, not to mention being an extremely awkward -- almost user-hostile -- way of compiling this information. Is this configuration following some sort of Wikipedia template? If not, I believe the singles discography should revert to a chronological format with charting B-sides listed alongside A-sides, and would be comfortable re-editing the work to accomplish this. 70.29.86.232 (talk) 20:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]