Talk:The Dark Redemption

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 June 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Star Wars Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Star Wars To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles.
Citing sources : Jedi, Sith
Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction.
Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..."
Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs
Other : * See the things to do page
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

Film: Australian / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Untitled[edit]

For some reason this article has been marked for deletion. While admittedly this page is not currently overflowing with information (it's a work in progress, and I wanted to save before I got too far), I don't understand why this page should be deleted. It's an article about a Star Wars fan film, no different than the articles about Crazy Watto and George Lucas in Love. What could possibly be the reasons for deletion, not to mention a speedy one? -- TomakaLinus 03:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not the person who flagged it, here, but you might wanna add the 'hangon' tag like mentioned in the pink box. that said, I think I support the article staying, mostly because of the reprised role bit. Cantras 03:13, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks for catching that. -- TomakaLinus 03:19, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion[edit]

This article was nominated for speedy deletion. I have removed the tag because a Google News Archive search shows independent coverage of the film. [1]. However, it is likely to be nominated for deletion unless references are provided from reliable sources. Capitalistroadster 06:49, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that's reasonable. I added your Google link plus a link to IMDB, as well as a link to the film itself on TheForce.Net. I also expanded the plot description a bit, so that the page is not just a tab. If anything else is required, just let me know. Thanks. -- TomakaLinus 16:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale for deletion[edit]

Does not meet general notability guidelines nor film-specific notability guidelines. Google News hits indicated by previous objectors to deletion are passing mentions, and do not discuss the film in depth. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 03:04, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]