Talk:The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Donald Trump Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

27[edit]

Don't really see the need for inline sources, but just in case, as per sources (two of them used for this article)

Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 00:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vox article[edit]

Vox says that their goal is clear, explanatory journalism, and this article does that very well:

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/1/5/16770060/trump-mental-health-psychiatrist-25th-amendment
The psychiatrist who briefed Congress on Trump’s mental state: this is “an emergency”
The case for evaluating the president’s mental capacity — by force if necessary.
By Eliza Barclay
Vox
Jan 5, 2018

--Nbauman (talk) 04:58, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nbauman: Added to support an existing sentence with a cited quote. Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 19:23, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution for use of material in Draft:Mental health of Donald Trump[edit]

Material from this page has been incorporated into Draft:Mental health of Donald Trump. bd2412 T 01:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cannon comment[edit]

I removed it for a few reasons: it seems to be a random opinion by someone who misunderstood the foreword and who believes that Trump derangement syndrome is an actual thing. The foreword was a survey of important history events where psychologists have participated. Apart from that and calling all those events malignant, there was no claim of equivalency. —Paleo Neonate – 18:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement tag[edit]

I left it as I think that part of the lead and maybe the beginning of the reception section appear promotional. The lead section part cites a primary source about that it was a best-seller, that a new edition was in demand, etc. —Paleo Neonate – 18:31, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]