Talk:The Conspiracy of Pontiac

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 3 February 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved for now, wait for the draft article to get published in the mainspace then consider this move again. (non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 06:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


The Conspiracy of PontiacThe Conspiracy of Pontiac (film) – The primary topic should be the book by Francis Parkman, which is substantially older and was highly signifigant in the 19th century[1]. Jahaza (talk) 04:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've started working on the article on the book at Draft:The Conspiracy of Pontiac. Jahaza (talk) 04:29, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for now. The draft isn't very far along (one sentence so far) and right now there's only one article using the title. Once the draft is completed and in mainspace, this article could be moved as proposed and The Conspiracy of Pontiac made into a dab page. Station1 (talk) 07:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support the film is not WP:PT. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, there is no reason to do this without the draft for the book in main space. Esolo5002 (talk) 15:08, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Maybe wait for the book to be created or just create is from the redirect after this move but anyway per WP:PRIMARYRED there is no requirement that the article has actually been written. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.