Talk:The Conjuring 2

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Conjuring 2 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 6 months

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened:

A fact from The Conjuring 2 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 October 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that on the first day of filming The Conjuring 2: The Enfield Poltergeist, the set was blessed by a priest?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Conjuring 2: The Enfield Poltergeist.

Wikipedia

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[There Was a Crooked Man#In popular culture|Crooked Man]] The anchor (#In popular culture) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Horror Film vs Supernatural Fiction Horror Film[edit]

I have removed the reference to supernatural fiction as this movie is based on true events that unfolded in Enfield, England. After reading the sources there is reason to believe the story is mostly or completely true to the events that happened, therefore they are not "fictionalized". Dane2007 (talk) 01:21, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All of the other Conjuring films are labeled as "supernatural horror" films. Not so much "supernatural fiction", but the film has supernatural elements (the demon Valak, the demon nun, etc.), even if it is based on true events. Would it be safe to change it to "supernatural horror film"? Just an edit request. -- Draco9904 (talk) 4:26, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Second or Third[edit]

"It is the sequel to the 2013 film The Conjuring, and is the second installment in The Conjuring film series overall"

There seems to be debate over the changing of second to third. The Conjuring Film Series is based on The Conjuring and The Conjuring 2. The other movies are spin offs in the franchise but not the series. Thoughts on this? -- Dane2007 ^talk 23:36, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More than a film series, Conjuring seems to be evolving into a shared universe (akin to the Marvel Cinematic Universe). So I think we can say something like, "It is the second film in the Conjuring series, and third in the Conjuring universe". Kailash29792 (talk) 08:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would support that re-write to more accurately represent where it falls in line. -- Dane2007 ^talk 23:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Dane2007 ^talk 17:55, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Highest Grossing Horror film?[edit]

It is stated in the article that the Conjuring 2 became the second highest grossing horror film behind only the Exorcist. However, with the recent release of It, it has been noted that It has become the second highest grossing horror film behind the Sixth Sense. Does this not leave the Conjuring 2 to be the fourth highest grossing? Or the 3rd highest grossing at time of release? Britfan97 (talk) 08:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]