Talk:The Comic Strip

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stage show and televsion[edit]

I think the television and film work should be separated out from this article put on its own page, as this is a page about the stage show and performers and it seems a bit cluttered to me. The stage act was called The Comic Strip, the TV work is called The Comic Strip Presents... and really bears little relation to what went on at the Comic Strip club night. Kaleeyed (talk) 20:57, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great, great article with photos: http://shapersofthe80s.com/seismic-shifts/1980-a-new-decade-demands-new-comedy/#comment-5815

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Comic Strip. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051229023105/http://www.chortle.co.uk:80/news/dec05/strip421201.php to http://www.chortle.co.uk/news/dec05/strip421201.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Running times[edit]

I was thinking of adding running times to (most of) the TV work in the table. They are accessible from the DVD package. However, they would be the running times reflecting any re-editing for DVD, and any changes for the US market. I still think it would be useful info, though. I might mention those caveats in a footnote. Thoughts? Huw Powell (talk) 22:52, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extraordinary lack of ref sources throughout[edit]

This whole article totalling nearly 4,000 words has been given a mere 10 sources at the foot. Claim after claim, detail after detail are stated without supporting citations. This entire piece should be junked if we cannot justify its many "facts". 217.155.200.241 (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]