Talk:Tex McDonald

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Atlanta Braves.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Cincinnati Reds.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

External link[edit]

As per WP:ELBURDEN, disputed links should be excluded by default until there is consensus for inclusion. @Sundayclose: please explain what unique value you feel the disputed link provides when there is already a link providing a clearer image. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:27, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The link to F.A.G. provides a better image. WP:RSP#Find A Grave allows for some uses of the website, so the requirement for consensus does not always apply. Sundayclose (talk) 18:43, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sundayclose, the link from the other source is objectively better - the one at the disputed link is blurry - and you are not correct about the consensus requirement. Whenever a link is disputed, consensus is required to include it, even if there are excellent reasons to do so. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree about the quality of the images. "Objectively" means no personal evaluation, and each of us has our own evaluation of image quality. Sundayclose (talk) 18:48, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of your personal evaluation, the quality is not so much better to justify inclusion of the link. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Each of us has an opinion. Yours doesn't carry more weight than mine. Sundayclose (talk) 18:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which is why we have ELBURDEN as a tiebreaker: if we can't arrive at a consensus then the link is excluded by default. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:58, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a "tiebreaker". My last comment unless you say something new or someone else comments. Sundayclose (talk) 19:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As we have been unable to reach at a consensus, I have removed the link per WP:NOCON. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:37, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]