Talk:Tennessee Aquarium/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Id4abel (talk · contribs) 17:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

ToDo need a citation that covers the 1992 opening claim (probably already in extensive references and can likely just copy and paste) Abel (talk) 21:00, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ToDo need a citation that covers the 2005 opening claim (probably already in extensive references and can likely just copy and paste) Abel (talk) 21:00, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ToDo need a citation that covers the conservation activities on display text (probably already in extensive references and can likely just copy and paste) Abel (talk) 21:00, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unresponsive nominator[edit]

This article needs little improvement to reach good article status so failing the review would be sad on a number of levels, however “If a nominator or other article editors are unresponsive and the article does not meet the criteria, then the nomination may be failed.” So while I understand that @BilCat:, @ZachofMS:, and @Floydcaro: have not touched the article recently, any assistance at all would prevent the review failing due to an unresponsive nominator.Abel (talk) 14:52, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Failure[edit]

With no response of any kind from anyone, I must fail the nomination. Abel (talk) 14:34, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for taking the time to review the article, Abel-- unfortunately, I wasn't able to check in while you were doing so. I will fix the issues you indicated, then resubmit. Womump (talk) 05:11, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]