Talk:Tempus Fugit (The X-Files)

Tempus Fugit (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Tempus Fugit (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 4) series, a good topic. It is also part of the Mythology of The X-Files, Volume 2 series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 3, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
July 26, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted
July 14, 2013	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage / The X-Files

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the X-Files task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tempus Fugit (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 03:10, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Intro: It says "'Zero Sum' helped to…" I assume this was just a typo.
- I'm a terrible copy-paster. GRAPPLE X 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Infobox: I would add a cite for the cast
- Added.
Production: What exactly is "verisimilitude"? Maybe wikilink it or explain it
- Realism, or the nature of being realistic; I could point it to verisimilitude or wikt:verisimilitude if you want, not sure which would be best for the casual reader; could also just reword it too if you think something else works best. GRAPPLE X 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Production: "Director Rob Bowman has admitted that the episode exceeded its given budget, noting…" I would remove the 'has' to say: "Director Rob Bowman admitted that the episode exceeded its given budget, noting…"
- Gone. GRAPPLE X 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reception: Maybe add "'Tempus Fugit' received mixed to positive reviews from critics."
- Added. GRAPPLE X 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reception: Should "A-" use an en-dash? Like "A–"? I'm not really sure, but I think so.
- MOS:MATHS uses "−" for minus, which is halfway between those two in size. I'll start using that from now on and try to roll it out on any past articles where I've used a hyphen-minus. GRAPPLE X 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Those hyphens and dashes drive me crazy.--Gen. Quon (talk) 14:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Those are the only things I can find. Solid article. On hold.--Gen. Quon (talk) 03:19, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks for the ridiculously prompt review. I've got everything so far except "verisimilitude", let me know which of the above options works best for you. GRAPPLE X 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - No problem. I submitted a few last night and saw this, so I decided to review it. Everything looks great; frankly I like the word verisimilitude, so I'd keep it and just link it to the Wiki page, that works for me.--Gen. Quon (talk) 14:25, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Fair do. I've linked to the wiki article for it then. GRAPPLE X 14:27, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - Awesome, it's a pass.--Gen. Quon (talk) 14:29, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]