Talk:Tellus Audio Cassette Magazine

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Tellus archivist (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Tellus. Their editing has included contributions to this article. self explanatory
Twinkletellus (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Tellus. Their editing has included contributions to this article. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tellus_Audio_Cassette_Magazine&oldid=215486150. signed name as Carlo Mccormick, a related figure to the article subject.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Valueyou (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. (self identifies as former employee of Joseph Nechvatal)

Magazines

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

New York City

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Besides the New York Times article, I also direct you to: http://freealbums.blogsome.com/

Twinkletellus (talk) 10:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This should help: See article in the New York Times: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9502EED71439F936A1575AC0A963948260

also —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twinkletellus (talk • contribs) 12:58, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From: http://continuo.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/tellus-updates/

Carlo McCormick Tellus: Time Loops Our Sonic Stigmata

As one of the primary stages upon which seemingly all of the ongoing cultural spectacle comes to take a turn, it is surprising just how dismal the New York City music scene’s track record has been in terms of mainstream popular culture. Whereas in other forms of production we enjoy a certain preeminence, somehow the music we make and listen to is by and large disregarded by consensus opinion elsewhere. No matter how much it may thrill us, or even the degree of institutional and critical support it may receive, we can usually be sure that whenever we try to export it anywhere our bands and musicians will fall upon deaf and antagonistic ears. We just don’t quite get it. When everyone else wants melody, we churn out noise. When tastes veer towards the ornate, we go for a brutal minimalism, or conversely, when simplicity is the way of the day, we pile up unwieldy multiple layers of sonic overload. When love is message, we release our rage, and yet when people are finally ready to rock, we retreat into self-reflexive abstraction. And of all our commercial sins, the music out of that New York City downtown/underground/vanguard nexus is always just too damn arty, smart, experimental, self-indulgent, process-oriented, atonal, conceptual, stylized, smugly diffident and all the rest. And even if history may prove kind to such a legacy in the end, this is the stigma which every band or single performer from this town must face each time they go on tour or sit down with a record company. It is a stigma that Tellus wears exceptionally well.

When it came time to gather together some of the music we were hearing in town for Tellus in the mid Eighties, this was an unmistakable fact about which we had no delusions. We were not in the business of making pop stars then, any more so than we are today. Working in nightclubs and performance spaces at the time, I understood that there was no audience per se, just a community of participants. In retrospect, what may have seemed like a curse then, was in reality a blessing. Now, it’s hard to imagine what any of this stuff could possibly sound like to an actual audience. Perhaps the context in which this music was made is much closer to contemporary experience than it might have been in its own time. The thing with New York was that, by the very nature of this urban beast, silence was a rare commodity and linearity a near impossibility. To be at home or in the studio was to have not just the sounds of one’s own thoughts, but a myriad of street noises- cars, sirens, people yelling, garbage trucks, and radios spitting out a ceaseless pastiche of international pop vernaculars. Perhaps the neighbors would be having another fight, the kids selling dope on the corner a new brand name to extol, the television is on, as is the stereo, and you’ve not quite put that book down to pick up the phone. This overlapping, all-subsuming, surfeit sensory saturation is the condition in which much of the music here was made. And what we hear of it today is inevitably either the denial or embrace each artist must determine in their relationship to the din of existence.

Carlo McCormick Twinkletellus (talk) 12:23, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semitransgenic removed the reference list[edit]

Why did Semitransgenic remove the reference list? Valueyou (talk) 07:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

because there is nothing to indicate in the main body of text that this is a reference list; there are no citations. Again, you are requested to consult WP:VER WP:OR & WP:NPOV to clarify how contributions should ideally be dealt with. Semitransgenic (talk) 18:39, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citation and page numbers[edit]

Semitransgenic mis-interprets Wikipedia citation guidelines. Please refer to WP:CITE. Quote:

«An article, paragraph or sentence is usually connected to the citation in one of four ways:

1. General reference: By placing the citation in a list at the end of an article.
2. Footnote: By placing it in a footnote following the sentence or paragraph it supports.
3. Shortened footnote: By placing the citation in the list and naming only the author, year and page number in a footnote.
4. Parenthetical reference: By placing the citation in the list and naming the author, year and page number in parenthesis (Ritter 2002, p. 45).

These are the most common methods of making articles verifiable. A Wikipedia editor is free to use any of these methods or to develop new methods; no method is preferred. Each article should use the same method throughout—if an article already has some citations, an editor should adopt the method already in use or seek consensus before changing it.»

See here[1] for correct use of page numbers.

Tellus archivist (talk) 08:36, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

link farm moved from article space[edit]

I moved these link farm from article space. The article space isn't where one should just have a farm of "in the media" or "on the internet" links without being used as sources. Moreover, all but the Wired.com source wouldn't be considered WP:RS. Graywalls (talk) 20:53, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Online articles[edit]

Carlo McCormick Tellus: Time Loops Our Sonic Stigmata, UbuWeb Tellus Notes
Marvin @ Freealbums Various Artists - Tellus 1 & 2
Kenneth Goldsmith Poetry Foundation Podcast: The Tellus cassettes
Marc Weidenbaum Classic Tellus Noise
Amanda MacBlane at New Music Box writing on TellusTools LP
[2] Master Cactus: The Art Zine Available Only on Cassette by Devon Maloney published at Wired (magazine) October 23, 2013

prior state[edit]

Just as a reference, prior to my editing on this, the page was basically used as a webhost. It was essentially a copy and paste from a wordpress. https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=&oldid=1011881408&use_engine=0&use_links=0&turnitin=0&action=compare&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcontinuo.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F03%2F03%2Ftellus-updates%2F Graywalls (talk) 07:13, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

no copyright violation[edit]

The blog that hosted the same text as the first version of this article, http://continuo.wordpress.com was operated by the same person who created this article. The link "Continuo on Wikipedia' on the top right corner of the blog, under See also, points to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tellus_archivist, where User:Tellus archivist writes This Wikipedia user (also known as blogger "Continuo"). That ought to alleviate any concerns about a potential copyright violation. The text was donated, if perhaps not in perfect compliance with our current licensing requirements. Vexations (talk) 12:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vexations:, Even if they were to officially donate it (unlimited use for whatever purpose as under Creative Commons. Something that do happen from time to time is people license thing for "Wikipedia purposes" with strings attached to it. This is not allowed. Another thing to mention is though WP:NOTAWEBHOST. It is not a place for hosting things that would be more appropriate for a website. This is why things like event timelines and such are discouraged. Graywalls (talk) 07:41, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged it with {{Copypaste}}, which requires that we remedy this by editing this article to remove any non-free copyrighted content and attributing free content correctly. That's what did: I have attributed the free content correctly. You seem to want to argue that the author did not understand the Terms of Use which states: "You License Freely Your Contributions". I'm well-aware that some users think that they can grant a non-commercial license to Wikipedia exclusively and I have made successful efforts to disabuse them of that notion. In this case there's no point trying because the editor has left and cannot be contacted. I fail to see how WP:NOTAWEBHOST has anything to do with the copyright issue. Vexations (talk) 10:40, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]