Talk:Task Force 6-26

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Task Force 6-26 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Middle East / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Task Force 121[edit]

The NYT and WP articles assert that TF 6-26 used to be called TF 121 -- is this accurate? The article currently states that 6-26 is "similar to" 121; reading the 121 article does not illuminate the issue. Are the reporters correct or did they make an error here?

TF's 121, 145 and 626 are three different units with the same mission of hunting down HVTs. The units have rotated in and out of Iraq, Afghanistan, and back for some down time in the USA with each other. 12.151.212.61 10:51, 18 October 2006 (UTC) Incorrect, I was attached to 121 when it changed TF designations to 6-26. 24.71.204.118 09:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

I added this concerning the motivation behind the creation of this article.--Storm63640 16:33, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you elaborate? It's a good idea to explain what is POV about an article when you add the tag, or indicate what should be addressed in order for the tag to be removed. "Drive-by" NPOV tagging is especially discouraged.--csloat 19:08, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]