Talk:Talking Heads (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

00:54, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Talkingheadsbrick.jpg[edit]

Image:Talkingheadsbrick.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copy protection[edit]

Yes, this album included one or more copy protection schemes. Additionally, hundreds of thousands of other albums, singles, films and even some photos and books included one or more protection schemes.

In the exceedingly rare instance where this is notable, independent reliable sources about the album will discuss it. This does not seem to be one of those instances. - SummerPhDv2.0 00:56, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Unless there was something remarkable about the album's use of copy protection (it was the first, it only used copy protection on the CD sides, etc.) that can be cited to a reliable source, there's no reason to mention it. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 02:01, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]