Talk:Survival Under Atomic Attack

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Can we have some commentary on the scientific accuracy of the text in this booklet? I would imagine people will come here and read this stuff and consider it fully accurate unless they're told otherwise... 154.5.85.250 09:16, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree with the comment above - like many civil defence documents of the Cold War their intent was to sanitise nuclear weapons and particularly to tone down the lethality of both immediate bomb effects (heat/light/blast) and delayed effects, particularly radiation. It may need some kind of context to illustrate that this kind of document was typical of the era and should not be seen as a wholly accurate or reliable account of what to do if attacked with nuclear weapons. Gitfinger (talk) 12:01, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Depends, some of it is useful... depending on how far away from the blast you are. --Spoonman.au 08:20, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would a link out to an emergency preparedness guidebook be of use on this page? It is free. Here is the link:Emergency PrepardnessSushilover boy 16:32, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]