Talk:Surbhi Chandna

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:36, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:51, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please Someone Make The Infonox Once Again It Was Deleted By Me Mistakenly...[edit]

I Am Very Sorry For It Guntaaz (talk) 08:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry😿😿 Kamo morakagane (talk) 16:29, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gold Glam and Style Awards (extended part of Gold Awards)[edit]

Hey Beccaynr! I removed an award from Surbhi Chandna's page but you reverted the same. I wanted to know that why did you do so because I didn't remove the respective content due to it being unsourced but due to its non-notability per WP:FILMCRITICLIST. The award's name is Gold Glam And Style Awards but was linked to Gold Awards. A discussion on the same matter was also discussed at an editor's talk page [1]. Do let me know your take upon this. ManaliJain (talk) 16:12, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ManaliJain: how many times do I have to tell you that both are different as per official description Gold Awards and Gold Glam & Style Awards. It's not mentioned that Gold Glam and style awards was 13th Award show as mentioned in Gold Awards 2019. There are so many awards using same name like Lions Gold Awards but all are different.Princepratap1234 (talk) 08:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on Princepratap1234, why are you behaving like this everywhere if it's not even meant for you. My comment was specifically for Beccaynr because they reverted my edit on Surbhi Chandna's article regarding this and asked me on their talk page to have this discussion about article content here on Chandna's talk page. ManaliJain (talk) 17:20, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]