Talk:Sundarbans South Wildlife Sanctuary

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Proposed moving to Sundarbans article Message to the originator... Hello Aditya, I have been given the article Sundarbans South Wildlife Sanctuary to 'Wikify', and I have found the large Sundarbans acticle and feel that the three small articles that you created in 2011 (Sundarbans South, West, East) would be more noticed if they are combined with this larger article. I have copied the material from the South, East and West articles to the Sundarbans article in the Geography section. The West one does not have much specific information about it. I wonder what you think of the material being moved here. If it works effectively, the three small articles could be deleted. What do you think? Travers (talk) 06:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]