Talk:Subaru (literary magazine)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Japan: Culture Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 03:48, May 25, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Culture task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Citations[edit]

Last time I translated a Japanese Wikipedia article that didn't cite any sources, I put upwards of an hour's work into it and it immediately got tagged for speedy deletion. I hastily gathered together some sources (a book I happened to have on hand, mostly) and went from there.

I didn't want that to happen again, so I have meticulously checked almost every statement this time on two independent, apparently reliable sources.

The only problem is that since I provide one or both of these sources for almost every single statement in the article, as it is now, and I'm not sure how to acceptably cite abbreviated references (i.e., author's surname and date plus page number) and only give extended bibliographical details once, in a Wikipedia article, the page is now cluttered with the same 20 or so words over and over again, and only two paragraphs of actual content. WP:CITE's basically saying that "an article should be internally consistent" is not much help.

Should I change all the individual citations to short forms, and add a bibliography section? If so, does the bibliography go before the reference list?

Any help would be appreciated.

elvenscout742 (talk) 03:01, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]