Talk:Stupid Dream

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Two times "second single"[edit]

two songs are claimed as the second single. and none of them has the "first single" .
"Pure Narcotic is the second single from the album."
"Stranger by the Minute became the second single from the album"

according to the discography on the oficial site [1]

these are the songles:
Pure Narcotic November 1999
Stranger by the Minute October 1999
Piano Lessons April 1999

so i'm changing the order in the article. just the part "Pure Narcotic is the second single from the album." to "Pure Narcotic is the third single from the album."
the reference already cite the oficial site so there's no need to change that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jchahin13 (talkcontribs) 19:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge articles to this one[edit]

The consensus of this AfD is that the articles for each individual song in this album need to be merged into this article. --Deathphoenix ʕ 20:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then do it. -- Cielomobile minor7♭5 04:40, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It needs to be merged, and it shouldn't just be what Steve Wilson said about the album, parts of it should be paraphrased. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CraigP (talkcontribs) 21:27, October 10, 2006 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:Porcupine Tree - Stupid Dream (DVD) (Front).jpg[edit]

Image:Porcupine Tree - Stupid Dream (DVD) (Front).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Future sources[edit]

To add to article for sourcing. Sergecross73 msg me 03:26, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Song analysis sources[edit]

Seems to be an on-going, track by track analysis of the album by PopMatters, definitely a reliable source. Very useful for expanding Stupid Dream or maybe even some of the song articles. Seems like they do one a week, so I'll add more in the future. Sergecross73 msg me 15:59, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Stupid Dream. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]