Talk:Strange Sensation

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved; revert recent move for primary topic, moved disambiguation page to Strange Sensation (disambiguation). JHunterJ (talk) 16:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

---

Suggested move

Strange Sensation (band) → Strange Sensation – It was originally there, but then moved to this to make a dab with two links--one here and the other a redlink. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

• Comment shouldn't this be Robert Plant & the Strange Sensation ? (is "Strange Sensation" a separate entity?) 76.65.128.132 (talk) 11:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

• Support as I did some time ago. Move the current page (Strange Sensation) over the REDIRECT at Strange Sensation (disambiguation) and put a corresponding hatnote on the band's article. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

• Oppose The title appears completely generic to naive readers – most readers, that is. It would mislead almost all of them. The capitalisation of "Sensation" doesn't begin to clarify things, given that caps are used in unpredictable ways in the wild (our readers are not intimately familiar with Wikipedia's capitalisation conventions). Someone might be after the article Itch, Phantom limb pain, Formication (sic), or something else that we have no way of anticipating. It is entirely unhelpful to lose the short informative qualifier "(band)", and clearly helpful to retain it. Noetica^Tea? 20:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Comment: All of the incoming links seem to refer to the band, none to Strange sensation. I understand Wikipedia uses bracketed terms for disambiguation, not as informative description. Having a disambiguation page, especially one without "(disambiguation)" and thus a likely search result, with a single proper target seems odd and unhelpful for navigation. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:02, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Why should anything link to Strange sensation? It doesn't exist! But see June 2011 page-view statistics for these articles, which are all to do with strange sensations:

• Aura (symptom): 21124

["It often manifests as the perception of a strange light, an unpleasant smell or confusing thoughts or experiences"; "Strange smells ... or tastes", and 18 more types of sensation in the subsection "Other sensations".]

• Paresthesia: 77313

["a sensation of tingling, burning, pricking, or numbness of a person's skin"]

• Itch: 26590

["... a sensation that causes the desire or reflex to scratch. Itch has resisted many attempts to classify it as any one type of sensory experience."]

• Formication: 12495

["a sensation that resembles that of insects crawling on (or under) the skin"]

And so on. Compare page views for the present page:

• Strange Sensation (band): 959

That's less than 1,000 against against a total of about 137,000 for just a sample of highly likely target articles, in June 2011. The ratio is less than 0.007. That hardly justifies losing the enormously informative qualifier "(band)", when there are so many more likely topics readers are looking for. In fact, Strange sensation ought to be DAB page that includes all articles listed above, and more.

Noetica^Tea? 05:37, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

It is possible for red links to have incoming links and many do. When I pointed out that Strange sensation doesn't have any, it was to demonstrate that nobody felt it necessary to link to that term. The fact that it's red demonstrates that nobody felt it necessary to create it. It's only Noetica's assertion that there is some compelling need for a navigational aid for this term. As that can't possibly be a REDIRECT, it has to be a disambiguation page, Strange sensation (disambiguation). If such a page should ever be created, I can see room for endless fun by adding various light-hearted terms which some might think fitting. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

• Support. I can sort of see Noetica's point, but unless he proposes adding Itch, Formication, Paresthesia, etc. to a Strange Sensation dab page, I don't see how readers are benefitted. So let me ask; Noetica - what do you think we should do with Strange Sensation? Dohn joe (talk) 18:16, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Comment: Strange Sensation should be moved over Strange Sensation (disambiguation). -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Strange Sensation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070204015904/http://www.tblweb.com/ to http://www.tblweb.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 7 January 2018 (UTC)