Talk:Stalin (Scheme implementation)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stalin (Scheme implementation) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled[edit]

Why is it called Stalin? 128.54.150.134 (talk) 23:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Due to its brutality. Barak (talk) 14:43, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

because the author think stalin use is funny. For that kind of "jokes" lovers I suggest him (jew i think) name it Hitler. Or hitler isnt so funny? The author is an asshole. 77.52.154.115 (talk) 23:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)2jerk[reply]

It is open source, so you can fork stalin and call your version "hitler" if you wish. As to why the name "stalin" is funnier than "hitler", I'd put it down to the big bushy mustache. Barak (talk) 19:54, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What?[edit]

On a number of tests it has outperformed hand-written C, sometimes by a considerable margin.

Subjective much?

Full R4RS Scheme is supported, with a few minor and rarely-encountered omissions

As long as it's full R4RS, I'll settle with omissions.
-_- Paxcoder (talk) 13:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]