Talk:Spice Lisp

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Spice Lisp article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computer science Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Computing: Software Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

I infer from the existing description that it's a compiler, not an interpreter, but nowhere is this actually stated. Perhaps this fact should be added?—greenrd (talk) 22:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lisp is, by definition, an interpreted programming language. Spice Lisp included a compiler that could reduce a lisp function definition to a sequence of low-level, stack-based instructions (much like Java byte codes). The 'eval' function—the heart of the Read-eval-print loop—could directly interpret lisp source code, and it would allow the underlying virtual machine to handle any pre-compiled functions that it encountered along the way.

This was not a distinguishing feature of Spice Lisp. The architecture was similar to other lisp implementations of its day (e.g., to Symbolics Lisp Machine lisp).71.199.121.113 (talk) 19:48, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox says, "Host PDP-10, OS TOPS-10." That's not entirely accurate. A TOPS-10 system and Maclisp were used to bootstrap Spice Lisp development, but that platform was quickly abandoned once the PERQ implementation was able to stand on its own. The TOPS-10 version never was complete, and it never was intended to perform well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.149.30.179 (talk) 22:16, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relationship to CommonLisp[edit]

Spice Lisp adhered to the CommonLisp specification before either it or the CommonLisp spec was released to the public. 75.149.30.179 (talk) 17:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed! Guy L. Steele Jr., Author of the original "Common Lisp Reference Manual," sat in on the weekly meetings of the team that developed Spice Lisp while he was drafting the manual. The Spice Lisp team contributed somewhat to the manual, including feedback about what was or was not reasonable to expect from a practical implementation. 74.111.96.172 (talk) 19:56, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]