Talk:Special Demonstration Squad

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement C‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

historical record?[edit]

DIfficult to write this article, as the SDS was an indefensible organization. The level of malfeasance was so poor that the government shut down the SDS.

Not sure what to say about the SDS for the historical record, other than this was a really terrible idea and should never happen again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.174.21.27 (talk) 20:27, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source material[edit]

"Police use of dead children's identities 'justified'". BBC News Online. 11 July 2013. Retrieved 11 July 2013.

—Sladen (talk) 09:52, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Operation Herne report: http://content.met.police.uk/cs/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheadername1=Content-Type&blobheadername2=Content-Disposition&blobheadervalue1=application%2Fpdf&blobheadervalue2=inline%3B+filename%3D%22480%2F119%2FCO634-12OpHernereport.pdf%22&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1283637911711&ssbinary=true

Kookiethebird (talk) 14:47, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of balance[edit]

Regardless of the reprehensibility of this unit and its actions, this article strikes me as heavily imbalanced to the point where it loses objectivity. 9warrej (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]