Talk:Spartel

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

Oceans Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of oceans, seas, and bays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Oceans To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : List of oceanographers, create a comprehensive article on Concentrations of marine debris out of all the gyre and "garbage patch" articles
Copyedit : Draft:Terrance (octopus)
Expand : Coral Sea, Endeavour Strait, Greenland Sea, Solomon Sea
Photo : find images for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in the oceans
Stubs : Oceanography stub articles, Marine geography stub articles, Aleutian Trench, Bellingshausen Sea, Caernarfon Bay, Gerlache Strait, Gulf of Oman, Iceland Sea, Draft:Terrance (octopus)
Update : Botany Bay, Wilkins Sound, Mariana Trench, Challenger Deep
Verify : Antarctic Circumpolar Current, Bering Sea, Gulf of Aden, Iceberg B-15, Ionian Sea, Japan Trench, Moreton Bay, Sound (geography), Timor Sea
Other : add ISBNs and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from Aral Sea; check La Belle (ship) for GA status; improve citations or footnotes and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from MS Estonia

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Georgeos Diaz-Montexano (talk · contribs) / sortkey This user has not edited the article.

Comment[edit]

Dear Sir

It should be kind of you to ad the following reference concerning Cape Spartel hypothesis :

COLLINA-GIRARD, J (2001).-L'Atlantide devant le Detroit de Gibraltar ? mythe et géologie. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris, Sciences de la Terre et des Planètes. 333 (2001) 233-240

(the paper from Gutsher is only a development of this paper : available on Sciencedirect.com). In the text he cited this paper …

I can send you a paper : spartel bank hypothesis but only in attached file by e-mail …

Thank you Jacques Collina-Girard

spartel bibliography[edit]

Dear Sir

It should be kind of you to ad the following reference concerning Cape Spartel hypothesis :

COLLINA-GIRARD, J (2001).-L'Atlantide devant le Detroit de Gibraltar ? mythe et géologie. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris, Sciences de la Terre et des Planètes. 333 (2001) 233-240

(the paper from Gutsher is only a development of this paper : available on Sciencedirect.com). In the text he cited this paper …

Thank you

Jacques Collina-Girard

Origin of hypothesis: NPOV edits[edit]

I have reverted edits like this one because they do not conform to Wikipedia's policy of a neutral point of view. The original wording was constructed to be as neutral as possible:

The origins of this hypothesis are disputed. It may have been proposed in 2001 by French geologist Jacques Collina-Girard, but a similar hypothesis was first published by the Spanish-Cuban investigator Georgeos Díaz-Montexano in an April 2000 issue of Spanish magazine Más Allá de la Ciencia (Beyond Science), and later in August 2001 issues of Spanish magazines El Museo (The Museum) and Año Cero (Year Zero). Collina-Girard first published his hypothesis in a September 2001 issue of Science Academy.

This wording doesn't claim that Collina-Girard plagiarized Díaz-Montexano's hypothesis (as Díaz-Montexano claims), nor that Díaz-Montexano's hypothesis is totally different and psuedo-scientific fantasy (as Collina-Girard claims). Wikipedia can not take sides in any argument, only present both sides of the argument as completely and accurately as possible. If there are still any problems with the original wording, let's discuss them here on the talk page instead of engaging in endless reversion. -kotra (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After reading the original passage again, I can see how it might be interpreted as slightly biased in Diaz-Montexano's favor. I've reworded it to a more neutral and encyclopedic tone, which I hope everyone can be comfortable with. -kotra (talk) 22:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paranormal[edit]

Dear Sir, I am absolutely opposed to classify my hypothesis in "paranormal" category … I speak only about geology and prehistory, and I published my hypothesis in scientifics publications ! I don't believe to paranormal or others pseudosciences ! … which are published in esoterics publication. For my part, I don't believe to the reality of the "city of Atlantis" or others fantasies of "lost cities" … I evoqued only the possibility that Plato myth could be, (perhaps ?) , related to an island which disapeared off Gibraltar strait at the end of prehistoric times as the geology prooved … and transmitted by the way of oral transmission to the aegyptians and transmitted to Plato who used it to make and "historical novel".

I am astonished that a serious enclyclopedia as you want to be, developped hypothesis related to pseudo sciences and fantastic archaeology : perhaps you can, more honnestly, published these hypothesis in science fiction and fantasy literature or in sociology , psychology, or psychiatry ! Jacques Collina-Girard —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.36.142.38 (talk) 08:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing up your concerns. The purpose of the WikiProject Paranormal banner was to make it easier for editors interested in improving Paranormal-related articles to find those articles that need help. It's not exactly a classification of the topic of the article as "paranormal", but I can see how that impression could be made. I think an editor added the WikiProject Paranormal banner to this page[1] because he felt that Atlantis theories are fringe science (outside of the mainstream). However, I agree with you that this particular article is not really related to the paranormal except in a very tangential way, so I have removed the WikiProject Paranormal banner. Thanks again for bringing it up! -kotra (talk) 05:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]