Talk:Spamigation

Could be zoning code enforcement is using this....

Delete[edit]

Hey, this article seems to be a neologism which is not well known even on the internet. As such, I think it should be nominated for deletion. Thoughts? Cool Hand Luke 19:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say keep the article b/c it meets the criteria for reliable sources about the term at Wikipedia:Avoid_neologisms#Reliable_sources_for_neologisms. But I will admit I'm biased since I created the article, so I look forward to other editors chiming in.--Alabamaboy 19:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this article should be kept, there are multiple reliable sources. Wooyi^{Talk to me?} 19:37, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs are not normally considered reliable sources. The reliable sources here seem to use the word at most. I think this one is on the fence, but it probably just needs a mention in SLAPP. Cool Hand Luke 19:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable Wording[edit]

"which results in one source claiming that the RIAA actually makes more money from settlements in these cases than it costs to file the lawsuits." Isn't that what all civil lawsuits are about? Who files a lawsuit they won't realize a gain from?

Also, this article is not clear about whether it makes a difference if the activity over which the defendants are being sued is actually illegal or whether it's being used to prevent people from exercising their legal rights.Bostoner (talk) 03:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]