Talk:South Carolina presidential primary

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

NPV, Low Quality article lacking basic facts[edit]

The whole long second paragraph makes it sound like the primary system is designed completely by shadowy forces behind the RNC. This is clearly untrue. The legislature of South Carolina sets it's date, and their concerns are likely to be to maximize the influence on the process, not to serve as a firewall. Are all of the voters thinking: "our job it to stop insurgents", as the paragraph implies.

Meanwhile basics are not included in the article. Does it have open or closed voting, or something in between. How are delegates awarded?

Needs a lot of work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.76.12 (talk) 21:50, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I reworded the first few paragraphs and made it more neutral. SirLagsalott (talk) 12:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Heavy focus on Republican primary[edit]

The lead only mentions the Democratic primary once when discussing the racial makeup of South Carolina. The rest of it talks about Republican strategy and results. The lead needs to be shortened and it needs to adequately cover both parties. SirLagsalott (talk) 12:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:New Hampshire primary which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 08:16, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]