Talk:Sounds and Silences

Television: Episode coverage / The Twilight Zone Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the Twilight Zone task force.

STOP EDITING FOR TRIVIA!!![edit]

will people just please stop editing this page to throw other people off on the stevens point, wi trivia... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yugiohdan6 (talk • contribs) 03:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up?[edit]

tone and language is a bit informal for my liking — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.77.243.97 (talk) 08:42, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious statement[edit]

I just "dubiousized" the final sentence in the "Litigation" section. The statement requires a source and a date because the episode has been available as part of the syndication package on Syfy, MeTV and Amazon Prime Video for over a year. Canonblack (talk) 16:57, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed the "dubious—discuss" flag[edit]

I consulted the cited source, and clarified the statement as regards the episode being for some time withheld from syndication (20 years) due to the initial syndication package being made before the litiation was resolved. Hopefully this is sufficient.MrNeutronSF (talk) 09:36, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of the five episodes that was not put into the original syndication package. The only thing dubious about the claim is that the writer won the suit. According to The Twilight Zone Companion, "the matter was settled", but it's not clear whether a judge awarded the $3500, or if they reached a settlement before the verdict was in. BurkeDevlin (talk) 00:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]