Talk:Sonicflood

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sonicflood article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Christian music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is incredibly biased and sites no information whatsoever.[edit]

I'm sure you magic people know how to deal with this.--99.140.58.148 (talk) 07:13, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This reads like it was copied directly from a record labels marketing press release.--Davim00 (talk) 18:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The page exists in both places. SONICFLOOd appears to be the correct way to write it, but this page has more work done on it. A move has been requested. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 04:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This a s merge, that everybody who is interested can do. After merging, just make it a redirect. -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 02:59, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A merge seems really sensible — after all, they're both talking about the same group, so we can't have both co-existing, and they both have good material in them. Any volunteers? ^talkGiler S 11:43, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, we're merging Sonicflood into SONICFLOOd (leaving Sonicflood as a redirect), correct?--Ktdreyer 17:22, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Er, sorry for the confusion :) It seems like everything's done, so I'll add the redirect to SONICFLOOd.--Ktdreyer 17:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring history section[edit]

It seems the entire "History" section of this article was completely replaced at some point within the past year. Another website has appeared to have directly pulled the text from the previous Wikipedia entry in 2008 [1]. I am proposing this text be restored, along with the links intact. The reason for this request is the text that was replaced uses better language and is written in a way that adheres more properly to Wikipedia's guidelines. The current text, as has been pointed out, does not cite references and is completely biased, almost reading like a press release from a record label. Please verify the restoration of the old text to make this article adhere to Wikipedia's standards.--Davim00 (talk) 22:05, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so there's more to this than I thought. I came through the project a few days ago and blew away several blatant (c) violations, including this one. I just moved it back to my last revision, since I knew that it at least didn't have issues as large... but if there's a more optimal history available, go ahead and restore it. I'm standing by with 3-4 sources already for proper expansion. Just lemme know. Dan, the CowMan (talk) 08:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After the mountain of recent expansion, feedback would be appreciated at this point. Dan, the CowMan (talk) 01:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

new albums[edit]

we need articles for the two new albums i have cover art so.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glman99 (talk • contribs) 20:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]