Talk:Song at Midnight

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:SongatMidnightDVD.jpg[edit]

Image:SongatMidnightDVD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reputation?[edit]

Alas, the reputation is due solely to the scarcity of early Chinese films. You may judge for yourself, since the film is available for download from archive.org. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 18:36, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup and Expansion[edit]

This article is poorly written and developed, and is missing a significant amount of information on the film. The missing portions include information on the film's plot, production theatrical/home media release, and reception. The article is essentially missing all information which needs to be added in their own separate sections and given proper citations. The Reputation section is unnecessary and should be removed from the article with the exception of the sourced material which can be merged into a reception section. All of these changes and additions need to occur in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards of a well developed and properly sourced article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 17:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]