Talk:So Much (for) Stardust

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title of Page[edit]

Should the title not just be "So Much (For) Stardust, given its a double entendre? 2600:1700:9730:4BC0:7CD6:AA87:6459:5549 (talk) 03:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, and I have reverted the page move. If the double entendre were merely denoted through an all-caps part of a title, I would fully agree it's a stylisation, but I don't believe a parenthesised part of a title is a stylisation. With this logic, songs that have a parenthesised part at the beginning (e.g. "(You're So Square) Baby I Don't Care") or end (e.g. "Do You Know (What It Takes)") are also "stylisations". Having the page at So Much for Stardust forces one meaning when I think it's pretty clear it's intended to be read both as a "hopeful"(?) or "doubtful" statement, "So Much Stardust", and "So Much for Stardust", hence why the one portion is parenthesised. Ss112 05:02, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I'm usually against editors excessive denotations of stylizations, but this is one of those times where it's important to retain because it alters the meaning. Sergecross73 msg me 14:42, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]

https://www.nme.com/news/music/fall-out-boy-patrick-stump-interview-so-much-for-stardusy-joe-trohman-love-from-the-other-side-lyrics-meaning-3384299 Sergecross73 msg me 14:42, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 March 2023[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hold Me Like a Grudge was not a single. It should be removed from the singles list. Robertbullin (talk) 13:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Rolling Stone appears to call it a single, at least. If there's a counterpoint, it'd be best to hold further discussion until there is a consensus on it. Sergecross73 msg me 13:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]